Posts tagged advertising
The Robin Hood Tax
Feb 10th
I don’t let my day job entrude on the pages of this blog very often but this is such a well put together film, the performance is brilliant and the impact it could have on the lives of the world’s poorest people so immense, I couldn’t resist it.
Please take the time to watch it, it’s more than entertaining enough to fill three minutes of your life and it offers a concrete and very real way you can take a small action that could change the world.
The Idiot Register: Smugness
Jan 28th
Once again, The Stairwell welcomes Mr Hunt as he rails against something inconsequential to such a degree he loses his perspective completely and thus fails to elicit any sympathy from his readers.
SMUG: The attitude of idiocy
Like my smiling dullard of a blogmate, I use a Mac. I’m not going to go on about it, I just like them better. They work for me. Other operating systems are available but they usually make me want to rip the monitor from the desk and use it as a makeshift weapon to obliterate the whirring, beige desktop box that houses the spawn of Satan OS coding.
Sidebar: this has become a lot easier since the introduction of LCD screens that can be wielded one-handed.
But I digress. As I said, Mac OS is my weapon of choice but that doesn’t stop me hating the “I’m a Mac, I’m a PC” ads with the heat of a thousand dying suns. They are just so smug. They aim for humour and instead land slap bang in the middle of toe-curling embarrassment and stomach-churning, eye-bleeding awfulness.
Here is one now:
I just inadvertently watched it again during the process of uploading it and something awful happened. I was so incensed by Apple’s air of smug superiority I grabbed the nearest thing I could lay my hands on and threw it out the window. Now I don’t have a cat anymore.
Thanks, Apple. Way to go you dead-eyed, bland-vomiting cat killers.
The flip side of all this is that in some ways I actually thought my allergic reaction to the overwhelming smug-storm Apple sent cascading unbidden into my eyes and ears was a positive sign. It showed that despite my exclusive devotion to their technology, I wasn’t a fan boy. I still had the capacity to bring my critical functions to bear on something that was unequivocally crap, however many shiny apple logos they slapped all over it. I didn’t like the ‘Mighty Mouse’ either. I was still a long way from becoming the sort of emaciated, drooling hipster that wears their Apple affiliation like some sort of brushed-aluminium badge of creativity.
I was safe.
And then Microsoft went and launched the Windows 7 campaign and in doing so set a new bar for smug, self-satisfied, condescending marketing effluent. Well done, Team Gates, you just blew away my only handhold, literally my last hope of remaining non-partisan. I hope you’re proud of yourself.
Microsoft, you see, thought it would be a good idea for people to hold Windows 7 Launch Parties – where run-of-the-mill people like you and me could get together with friends and teach each other to laboriously burn a DVD of people snowboarding or whatever. Doesn’t that sound like fun – marketing a product you hate, foisting it on your love ones and not even getting paid for the privilege?
The most laughable part of this whole mess is that Microsoft genuinely thought people would do this. Faced with millions of Mac evangelists they clearly thought people would want to do the same for them. Shout the seventh coming of Windows from the rooftops. They seemingly failed to grasp the self-evident difference that people CHOOSE to use a Mac. Windows is just the car crash of an OS we all got landed with by default. No one wants to bring up Windows around the water cooler, it’d be like cheerfully striking up a conversation about taxes or STDs or global poverty, they’re just a distasteful part of life that have been around so long people have forgotten it could be any other way.
Anyway, in order to get people to organise these deluded, creepy Windows 7 launch shindigs, Microsoft put together a video that they no doubt dubbed ‘edutainment’.
(excuse me, my dictionary just haemorrhaged blood onto the carpet, I just need to clean it up)
…
Where was I? Right, the video. Realising that no human being would ever want to be part of such a travesty, Microsoft built and programmed a group of androids to star in the advert. The droids would appear humanoid and physically signify the different demographics Microsoft hoped to appeal to – old, geeky, irritating and black respectively. These demographics would each wear a stupid colour-coded uniform as if they were in Star Trek or something. Unfortunately the finished robots were given a variant of the Windows operating system and subsequently failed to be able to act, speak, produce a realistic air of camaraderie or generally pass for human beings by whatever metric you cared to apply.
The result was not only the worst advert in the history of advertising but also quite possibly the poorest example of work produce by any human being in any discipline, ever. It is the nadir of modern civilisation, making a complete mockery of the noble journey begun by Neolithic man when he first scratched an ethnically diverse herd of buffalo onto the rocky wall of his cave. Beating by some margin even the moronic delight’s of R. Kelly’s “Trapped in the Closet”.
What we have here, people, is a piece of work so smug, so sickening, so utterly blind to its own ridiculousness – that it defies any attempt to truly describe it.
Like the Matrix, you have to see it.
And see it you must.
How far did you get through it before your soul withered to a dry husk within your chest and you dropped to the floor, leaking black tar from every orifice?
I only got as far as the bit where they suggest making the party list using ‘party planning tools’.
Utterly devoid of merit thought it is, the video is at least controllable. Avoid typing ‘talentless idiot party’ into Google and you’re basically going to escape unscathed.
So Microsoft busted out the poster campaign.
Now I can’t go down into the underground without being faced with a virtual tableau of Smugotrons claiming they had something to do with making Windows 7.
And why are they so keen to claim that anyway? It’s not like it’s the cure for cancer or anything, is it? Even if they did come up with the shaking-to-clear-the-other-windows thing (which they didn’t) I can’t even begin to describe how little I care.
Look at him. Look at his smug little face. I want to hurt him so bad. I want to stuff that chip up his nose and into the sinus cavities beyond. Then I want to slam his face against the wooden table top until he chokes to death on blood engorged potato mush.
Is that an over-reaction?
Every day I have to endure a whole tunnel of these images on the underground, trapped on a travelator that Microsoft have probably programmed to run at half speed to prolong the encounter. I’m genuinely surprised that instances of grievous bodily harm haven’t shot up ten fold on the Jubilee line. Personally, it takes everything I’ve got not to beat at the giant images with my fists until my knuckles are cracked and torn from the impact.
Okay, that’s it. I can’t see anymore. I think I must have finally reached blind fury.
I’m going to go and find my cat.
iTablet
Jan 27th
Take a look at this picture.
It’s a pretty rubbish picture, isn’t it? It’s grainy and someone has taken chunks out of it. It’s low resolution and you can’t see much of anything.
Well it may interest you to know, gentle reader, that this unassuming picture is currently making the internet geek out in a fairly major way. Because this might very well be the first public photo of the iTablet – the new Apple product Steve Jobs is set to present to the world at 6.00pm GMT today.
Rumours of the iTablet have been rife since 2002 when everyone thought it was basically going to be an iPod with a keyboard. Since there it’s gone through many rumoured iterations, everything from a flat MacBook to a giant iPhone. But the really funny thing is, all of this furious product development is in our heads. Apple has kept completely silent about the thing, it won’t officially confirm it exists at all. Even the invitation for today just says:
So what we’re talking about here is a fictional product that the public has seemingly willed into existence just by dint of WANTING it so badly. At some point in the past, someone presumably thought ‘Wouldn’t it be cool if Apple made a tablet device?’ and from that inauspicious starting point we’ve collectively worked ourselves up into a frothing mess. Without Apple lifting a finger. It’s a wonder they bother doing any advertising at all. (Especially when it’s this smug and irritating)
So if Steve Jobs does present the technological equivalent of the Loch Ness Monster today, there’s a good chance it’ll look like the photo above. There have been many a photoshopped hoax before, ranging from the plausible:
To the slightly silly:
… but nothing as realistic as the above. It’s bolted down, it doesn’t give anything away. It has the whiff of authenticity.
The other thing is that we’re not really even sure what we want the device to do. “Tablet” is a form factor, it’s the body the clever stuff is housed in, it doesn’t give any clue as to what the gizmo would actually do. Is it a slightly more portable laptop, an ebook reader, a PDA writ large, an entertainment and games system? Knowing Apple it’ll probably be a lot of these things but there are still a myriad ways to implement those functions. Do you go for a traditional OS X set up with files and folders and a simulated desktop environment or something more like the multi-function iPhone OS which basically transforms the entire user interface on the fly depending on the function you select? We may firmly believe that this thing is going to revolutionise portable computing forever (like the iPhone arguably has for the mobile phone industry) but as it stands we just have no conception of what it actually is or what it’ll do for us.
Until now.
Because that picture above gives away more than it seems to. If it’s genuine (and I think it is) then we’ve finally got some answers to at least some of our questions. For a start that’s undeniably a massive version of an iPhone application, so we now know it’ll be running something at least closely related to the iPhone OS. Also notice the wifi icon at the top of the page and the “no service” mobile phone signal indicator. So it’ll probably have wireless and a (persistent?) 3G connection – something akin to Amazon’s Kindle – allowing the user to download books, newspapers, movies, albums and browse the web. The iTunes store will become the iGeneral store and Apple begins to take on Amazon on it’s home ground. You can also see a home button at the bottom, identical to that on an iPhone so we know something about the styling. Other rumours suggest a 10.1 inch screen and an aluminium back to fit in with the new iMacs and MacBook Pros.
So there we are, it’s the day of the launch and we’ve finally been able to define the device pretty well. What surprises haveApple managed to preserve?
Well for a start we just made up the name iTablet …
We’re all doomed
Jan 21st
The Tories are going to get into power. It’ll be like the 80s all over again. We’re in a fix.
But until then there’s this …
To see more (and to make your own), go here - http://mydavidcameron.com.
Let’s make the most of it while we can. The guy is going to be our leader soon.
Our leader.
It’s like a horrible dystopian nightmare.
Awareness Test
Nov 6th
If you haven’t seen this yet, it’s amazing. Have a go and then leave a comment to let me know if you passed.
Death to Walmart
Nov 2nd
Walmart owned cheapo supermarket Asda is rubbish. Watch this film to find out why.
Something to Ponder
Sep 23rd
Came across this blog post from Steve Henry at Campaign Magazine.
It’s brilliantly written and — well, I can relate, I guess.
What is wrong with this picture ?
I’m thinking of bringing out a t-shirt which reads “Polly Perkins is a tw*t”.
Although the asterisk is only there for Campaign’s lawyers.
You may know who Polly Perkins is. She’s been in the papers a bit recently, because she was the reader at Faber who turned down Lord of the Flies for publication, scribbling on the manuscript the words “uninteresting fantasy”.
History can be a lovely thing, when it allows anyone with a genuine love of literature and originality to turn round to Polly Perkins right now and say – you rejected one of the most important and successful books of the last century.
People will be reading your name and associating it with idiocy for decades to come.
How d’you like them apples, Perky ?
Interesting enough for you, is it ?
And what has this got to do with advertising, the supposed topic of this blog, you may be asking ?
Well, everything. Because how ideas are appreciated and judged should be at the heart of any creative business.
Especially when there’s a lot of interesting debate right now about things like the Peperami crowd-sourcing initiative.
But.
We’ve somehow turned into an industry where all decisions are made by committee. And where people only feel they’re contributing if they can tell you what their “concerns” are.
The best story about this comes from a wonderful semi-fictional book about the ad industry called “Was 9.99, Now 6.99″
Written by a guy who I think was working at Y&R Paris.
At one point he writes about a very stressful presentation to a hugely important yoghurt client.
(Imagine, for a bit of light relief, that previous sentence without the last word.)
Our hero presents his script and the head yoghurt (honcho) does that thing of letting all 14 people on his team say what they think of it.
I think we’ve all been in meetings like that.
I wonder if Michelangelo Buonarroti had that experience with his Sistine chapel ceiling.
“What do you think, Brian ?”
“Well I like it of course, but I’m just concerned about what it will say to non-believers, i.e. the people we’re trying to attract into the brand ? Will they like all the religious stuff I wonder ?”
So in the yoghurt meeting, our hero bites his tongue as 14 people express their perfectly logical and plausible concerns. He knows that in meetings like this, it only matters what the head honcho says.
And then the head yoghurt (honcho) says “I love it. This is the best work the agency has presented to me for 5 years. I pass my sincere congratulations on to the whole team.”
Phew. Everybody smiles and lets out a sigh of relief.
“I have just one question,” he adds.
Pregnant pause.
“… Is humour really necessary ?”
In four words, he’s killed the idea more comprehensively than any of his lieutenants.
Because without humour, the script is just two people eating yoghurt.
However, in normal meetings, the killing isn’t as clean as this. Normally it’s deadly attrition.
Take a look at any list of so-called “100 greatest ads” – which by the way won’t have many examples in it from the last few years. (What you might call the “committee years”.) Imagine if any of those great pieces of work could have got through a meeting where a group of 14 people are encouraged to voice their “concerns”.
In fact what you’ll see is a bunch of ads that all have one thing in common – which is that they all have something “wrong” with them.
In fact, what’s “wrong” with them is what makes them successful.
Breaking the right rules is what any creative person will tell you is what you have to do.
And the really interesting question is this.
How many “bad” ads have killed products ?
I.e. how many people have been turned off a brand because of some element of the advertising ?
Name me one, apart from Strand cigarettes – which is 50 years old.
I.e. this search for the “concerns”, for what might be “wrong”, is by and large a complete waste of time.
Ads tend to work a little bit – or work really well. Very few of them actively damage a brand.
Their biggest enemy is just disappearing into the wallpaper of invisible marketing communications. Which, of course, is what most of them do.
So a far more useful discussion would revolve around asking – “What is good about this ? What is the most interesting thing about this communication ? Have we got something really spiky here ?”
But try telling that to Polly Perkins.
She’d tell you what was wrong with that idea straightaway.










